Comments for Turbo4 http://turbo4.com Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:10:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 Comment on Year End Video! by Fred http://turbo4.com/?p=39&cpage=1#comment-89 Fred Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:10:23 +0000 http://turbo4.com/?p=39#comment-89 Yo Tony, Looks good! Have fun at the dyno today, twist the dials off that mother. . . . . Yo Tony, Looks good! Have fun at the dyno today, twist the dials off that mother. . . . .

]]> Comment on Fuel Cell by Tony http://turbo4.com/?p=118&cpage=1#comment-9 Tony Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:02:44 +0000 http://turbo4.com/?p=118#comment-9 It's a bit under 3 gallons. It’s a bit under 3 gallons.

]]> Comment on Fuel Cell by dustin http://turbo4.com/?p=118&cpage=1#comment-7 dustin Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:48:42 +0000 http://turbo4.com/?p=118#comment-7 whats the capacity on that? whats the capacity on that?

]]> Comment on HAPPY NEW YEAR by dustin http://turbo4.com/?p=115&cpage=1#comment-6 dustin Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:56:09 +0000 http://turbo4.com/?p=115#comment-6 tony, thanks. i just downloaded the 2010 rules last night and began searching. it does look like H/D is the closest class for this car. unfortunately its a 198in chasis and with a 3.4L supra engine that puts us at 2030 min weight per cubic inch. thats gonna be hard to do. the last time this chasis was raced it had a 4cy and weighed 1160 w/o driver. It's unsure if the car will ever go to any major events, thats at the discretion of the customer. however the closer we get it to an actual class and can prove it falls within the rulebook the less of a chance we have of getting any grief from local track officials. tony,

thanks. i just downloaded the 2010 rules last night and began searching. it does look like H/D is the closest class for this car. unfortunately its a 198in chasis and with a 3.4L supra engine that puts us at 2030 min weight per cubic inch. thats gonna be hard to do. the last time this chasis was raced it had a 4cy and weighed 1160 w/o driver.

It’s unsure if the car will ever go to any major events, thats at the discretion of the customer. however the closer we get it to an actual class and can prove it falls within the rulebook the less of a chance we have of getting any grief from local track officials.

]]> Comment on HAPPY NEW YEAR by Tony http://turbo4.com/?p=115&cpage=1#comment-5 Tony Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:50:24 +0000 http://turbo4.com/?p=115#comment-5 Dustin, While we originally planned on competing in NOPI's Pro Extreme Dragster and Comp Eliminators I-dragster, we built the car completely to NHRA's comp rules after NOPI stopped its series. For a 6 cylinder car I'd recommend building to NHRA's H-dragster rules and possibly talk to Brian Fitzpatrick, who has a 2GZ GTE powered dragster and is competing in H-Dragster. Thanks, Tony Dustin,

While we originally planned on competing in NOPI’s Pro Extreme Dragster and Comp Eliminators I-dragster, we built the car completely to NHRA’s comp rules after NOPI stopped its series. For a 6 cylinder car I’d recommend building to NHRA’s H-dragster rules and possibly talk to Brian Fitzpatrick, who has a 2GZ GTE powered dragster and is competing in H-Dragster.

Thanks,

Tony

]]> Comment on HAPPY NEW YEAR by dustin http://turbo4.com/?p=115&cpage=1#comment-4 dustin Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:14:09 +0000 http://turbo4.com/?p=115#comment-4 hey, awesome dragster, we are building a 6cyl dragster right now...by what rules did you build or what class is the dragster built around. i know you run comp eliminator. just wondering what set of rules you followed most. thanks, hey, awesome dragster, we are building a 6cyl dragster right now…by what rules did you build or what class is the dragster built around. i know you run comp eliminator. just wondering what set of rules you followed most.
thanks,

]]>